Experiencing time in reverse
What is the meaning of “Time becomes Space”?
Today’s conversation is about the experience of time as both forward moving and backward moving, and how this works in the astral realm. We then shifted to how these ideas interface with modern technology.
In the fictional mountain village where portions of my books are set, there is an inventor/ jack of all trades who keeps a workshop. Above the workshop door is a sign that reads:
Gravity / Levity
Space / Counter-Space
Time / Reverse Time
Know Thyself
The first three pairings refer to the unorthodox theories of energy and physical reality.
In addition to the forces we perceive as gravity, there are forces of levity. The life forces. Viktor Schauberger, by way of Callum Coats, describes levity as such:
“Another pair of antitheses, not considered by science, are Gravitation and Levitation. Levitation is not taken into account at all, consideration being given only to gravitation, although a levitational force is basic to Nature. Viktor Schauberger once commented wryly that instead of asking himself what caused the apple to fall to the ground, Sir Isaac Newton should have asked how it got up there in the first place! What else if not levitation enables a tree to grow upwards against the action of gravity? Were there no levity, the tree would just spread out horizontally over the ground in a green amorphous mass. It does thrust skywards, however, and does so in response to another force operating in the opposite direction.”
(p.64 Living Energies by Callum Coats)


Counter-space is the pairing to Space. I’m not sure the first to coin the term, but Rudolf Steiner described it in his astronomy lectures. It has been more recently expanded on by alternative theorists, such as Eric Dollard. (See this Reddit post for a little overview and links. )
Think therefore for a moment that you had to do not only with ordinary space, conceived in its three dimension, but with a “counter-space” or anti-space”. Let me call it so for the moment, and I will try to evoke an idea of it, as follows. Suppose I form the thought of ordinary, three-dimensional, rigid space. I form the first dimension, I form the second dimension and I form the third dimension Then I have, so to speak, filled-in in thought—in the idea and mental presentation of it—three-dimensional space with which I am ordinarily confronted. Now as you know, in any such domain you can not only advance up to a certain degree of intensity; you can subtract from it too, and as you go on subtracting—taking away—you come at last to the negation of it. As you are well aware, there is not only wealth but debt. Likewise I cannot only make the three dimensions to arise in thought but I can also make them vanish. Only I now imagine the arising and vanishing to be a real process,—something hat is really there. Of course it is possible to think only two dimensions instead of three, but that is not my meaning. What I now mean is this: The reason why I only have two dimensions
Source 15 January 1921, Stuttgart
“Reverse time” is the topic of the conversation Angus and I had today, but we were talking about the astral theory. I first became aware of the scientific concept through the work of contemporary electrical engineer and researcher Eric B. Dollard.
I believe it’s somewhere in the video below, but you can at least get a flavor!




Hmmm...Hello there.
Great topics and presentation - thank you (very happy to see the Dollard stuff too!)